HOME | POLICIES | FAQ | CONTACT  
Program on Negotiation Clearinghouse
Your cart is empty

Resources
Sign In
Returning users may sign in. Registering with the Clearinghouse offers several benefits, including:
  • Save your customer information for quicker shopping.
  • View your order history.
Trademore Personnel
ROLE SIMULATIONS
Trademore Personnel

Lawrence Susskind and Bruce Patton
 
 
Per participant (Non-Profit/educational)$3.00
Per participant (For Profit)$4.00
Teacher's Package (Download Below)$0.00
SPANISH Per Participant$4.00
GERMAN Per Participant$4.00
Soft copyHard copyWhat to Order?

Download a review copy

Be the first to write a review

Free review copies of non-English Teacher’s Packages will be emailed upon request. Please contact chouse@law.harvard.edu or telephone 800-258-4406 (within the U.S.) or 781-239-1111 (outside the U.S.)

SCENARIO: Ann Taylor, head of the Learning Box Division at Trademore Company is having problems with a senior manager, Terry Hall. She has asked one of her staff members to represent the division in a discussion about Terry Hall with a staff member of the Research and Development (R&D) division. Bill Blass, head of R&D is currently in search of an additional Specialist IV and is concerned about the time it will take to fill the position. The Human Resource Development Office (HRD) has heard about the scheduled meeting of the two departments and has proposed that an HRD staff person also attend.

MECHANICS: Preparation for this simulation takes about 20 minutes, which includes enough time to read the material and discuss strategy. The negotiating time can run from 30 to 45 minutes. During the debriefing (approximately 30 minutes), participants should discuss actual and expected outcomes.

TEACHING MATERIALS:

  • For all parties:
    • General Instructions

  • Role specific:
    Confidential Information for:
    • Representative for Ann Taylor
    • Representative for Bill Blass
    • HRD Staff person

  • Teacher's Package:
    • All of the above

PROCESS THEMES: Assumptions; Authority; BATNA; Closure; Communication; Confidentiality; Constituents; Cost-benefit analysis; Creativity; Currently perceived choice analysis; Ethics; Fairness; Gilligan, two voices; Information exchange; Interest dovetailing; Interests, quantifying; Joint gains; Managing uncertainty; Meaning of "success"; Mediation, negotiating entry; Message analysis; Misrepresentation; Objective criteria; Options, generating; Preparation; Reality testing; Relationship; Selective perceptions; Separating the people from the problem; Yesable propositions

MAJOR LESSONS:

Comparing outcomes when two or more groups play the game allows participants to discuss the importance of strategy in negotiations.

The HRD intervenor may or may not choose to play a mediating role, or advocate the interests of the employee. Attempts to mix these two roles however, are likely to fail.

During debriefing, the impact of negotiating style and decision making processes should be explored.

The attitudes of the participants toward the fact that one of the department heads is a woman can be used to promote discussion on the connection between gender and negotiating styles.

Time required30 minutes - 1 hour
Number of participants3
Teams involvedNo
Agent presentNon-lawyer
Neutral third party presentMediator
ScoreableNo
Teaching notes availableNo
To search for other role simulations by attributes, use our role simulation advanced search tool.
Search

ADVANCED SEARCH >>
Topics
Arbitration

Business

Community

Consumer

Education

Environment

Ethics

Facilitation

Family

Government

High School/Young Adult

International

Intra-organizational

Law

Mediation

Medicine/Health

Multidisciplinary

Pedagogy

Prisoner's Dilemma / Game Theory

Psychology

Public Disputes

Technology

Reviews

Current Reviews: 0
Write a Review
PRIVACY POLICY Phone: 800-258-4406 (from within the U.S.) or 781-239-1111 (from outside the U.S.)
E-mail: chouse@law.harvard.edu
Copyright © 2004 The President and Fellows of Harvard College