HOME | POLICIES | FAQ | CONTACT  
Program on Negotiation Clearinghouse
Your cart is empty

Resources
Sign In
Returning users may sign in. Registering with the Clearinghouse offers several benefits, including:
  • Save your customer information for quicker shopping.
  • View your order history.
Parker-Gibson
ROLE SIMULATIONS
Parker-Gibson

Michael Wheeler
 
 
Per participant (Non-profit/educational)$3.00
Per participant (For Profit)$4.00
Teacher's Package (Download Below)$0.00
FRENCH Per Participant$4.00
PORTUGUESE Per Participant$4.00
SPANISH Per Participant$4.00
TURKISH Per Participant$4.00
Soft copyHard copyWhat to Order?

Download a review copy

Free review copies of non-English Teacher’s Packages will be emailed upon request. Please contact chouse@law.harvard.edu or telephone 800-258-4406 (within the U.S.) or 781-239-1111 (outside the U.S.)

SCENARIO: The Parkers and the Gibsons own homes on adjacent plots of land. The homes are separated by a 1/2 lot the Parkers purchased years ago in hopes of building a tennis court, which they never got around to. The Parkers are now moving out of state and are interested in selling the half lot, as the buyer of their home is not interested in it. The Parkers have approached the Gibsons (who have interest in the lot for home improvements they have planned) about purchasing the lot. Neither party knows much about the other's interests. The Parkers and Gibsons are meeting to explore whether a mutually beneficial transaction is possible.

NOTE: This exercise is a modified and improved version of a former exercise entitled Appleton v. Baker (Appleton v. Baker is still available, upon request). This exercise is also analytically similar to the exercises The Book Contract (with a different setting) and Bradford Development (without the linkage payment).

MECHANICS: The exercise is best run as a one-on-one exercise. Preparation should require 5-10 minutes. Negotiations can take from 10-30 minutes, and review from 30 minutes to 1 1/4 hours.

TEACHING MATERIALS:

  • Role specific:
    Confidential Instructions for:
    • Parker
    • Gibson

  • Teacher's package:
    • All of the above
    • Teaching Note (English version only)

PROCESS THEMES: Anchoring; BATNA; Fairness; Information exchange; Interests, dovetailing; Joint gains; Objective criteria; Offers, first; Pareto optimization; Quantitative analysis; Risk aversion; Trust

MAJOR LESSONS:

When several pairs negotiate this game at the same time, the resulting sale prices vary dramatically. Participants can then discuss how and why different negotiation strategies led to different outcomes.

Concepts of "fair prices" often surface in post-negotiation discussions. If participants do not take a "principled" approach to the negotiation, one side or the other often feels "taken," especially when other players with the same role appear to do better.

The advantages and disadvantages of making the first offer can be explored, as well as techniques for doing so.

The advantages and disadvantages of truthfully revealing your BATNA can also be illustrated, especially when several pairs negotiate the exercise.

Time required30 minutes - 1 hour
Number of participants2
Teams involvedNo
Agent presentNone
Neutral third party presentNone
ScoreableNo
Teaching notes availableYes
To search for other role simulations by attributes, use our role simulation advanced search tool.
Current Reviews: 1
Search

ADVANCED SEARCH >>
Topics
Arbitration

Business

Community

Consumer

Education

Environment

Ethics

Facilitation

Family

Government

High School/Young Adult

International

Intra-organizational

Law

Mediation

Medicine/Health

Multidisciplinary

Pedagogy

Prisoner's Dilemma / Game Theory

Psychology

Public Disputes

Technology

Reviews

Current Reviews: 1
Average Customer Rating
PRIVACY POLICY Phone: 800-258-4406 (from within the U.S.) or 781-239-1111 (from outside the U.S.)
E-mail: chouse@law.harvard.edu
Copyright © 2004 The President and Fellows of Harvard College