HOME | POLICIES | FAQ | CONTACT  
Program on Negotiation Clearinghouse
Your cart is empty

Resources
Sign In
Returning users may sign in. Registering with the Clearinghouse offers several benefits, including:
  • Save your customer information for quicker shopping.
  • View your order history.
New Crimea Prison Overcrowding Simulation
ROLE SIMULATIONS
New Crimea Prison Overcrowding Simulation

Susan Podziba and Lawrence Susskind

Copyright 1995, Program on Negotiation at Harvard Law School and Program on Correctional Leadership and Innovation at the Wharton Center for Applied Research Inc.
 
 
Per participant (Non-Profit/educational)$3.00
Per participant (For Profit)$4.00
Teacher's Package (Download Below)$0.00
Soft copyHard copyWhat to Order?

Download a review copy

Be the first to write a review

SCENARIO:

The state of New Crimea has an average daily prison population of 13,000, with the prison system currently operating at a 122% capacity. A federal judge recently ruled that such conditions violate inmates' constitutional rights, and ordered a 13% reduction of the inmate population within six months. Following this ruling, the governor of New Crimea organized a Prison Overcrowding Policy Commission, whose responsibility it is to develop policy recommendations that will alleviate the system-wide overcrowding. The legislature will then consider the Commission's proposals. Should the Commission fail to reach an agreement, the Department of Corrections will be forced to begin releasing inmates.

MAJOR LESSONS:

  • BATNA: This exercise requires participants to identify and focus on their Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement (BATNA). By clarifying their aspirations and BATNA, the players give themselves a range within which to evaluate options or packages that develop during the bargaining process.
  • Interests vs. Positions: Players should uncover the interests behind the Commission members' positions. This will enable the Commission to seek out new options in order to maximize joint gains, thus increasing its chances of reaching an effective, mutually acceptable agreement. This case introduces a potential "hard bargaining" situation. Loss of pride may prevent a player from agreeing to a different, but equally acceptable option.
  • Alliances: In this exercise, players should learn to maximize their bargaining power by forming political alliances. Coalition-building allows those without a strong power base to promote their most important interests as well as to create innovative options that satisfy multiple party interests.
  • MECHANICS:

    Estimated Time Requirements:
    Read instructions: 30 minutes
    Players in the same roles discuss strategy: 15 minutes
    Negotiations: 90 minutes
    Debriefing: 45 minutes
    Total: 3 hours

    TEACHING MATERIALS:

    For all parties:

  • Instructions
  • General Background
  • Editorial from The New Crimea Times
  • Role specific:
    Confidential Instructions for

  • The Corrections Commissioner
  • The Governor's Advisor
  • The Judge
  • The Parole Board Chairperson
  • The Prisoners' Advocate
  • The State Legislator
  • The Victim's Advocate
  • Teacher's package (47 pages total):

  • All of the above
  • Extensive Teaching Notes for debriefing
  • KEYWORDS/THEMES:

    Agenda control; Coalitions; Consensus building; Constituents; Correctional policy negotiations; Interest analysis; Political constraints, prison overcrowding; Dealing with Public opinion; State policy negotiations

    Time required2-3 hours
    Number of participants8
    Teams involvedNo
    Agent presentNone
    Neutral third party presentNone
    ScoreableYes
    Teaching notes availableYes
    To search for other role simulations by attributes, use our role simulation advanced search tool.
    Search

    ADVANCED SEARCH >>
    Topics
    Arbitration

    Business

    Community

    Consumer

    Education

    Environment

    Ethics

    Facilitation

    Family

    Government

    High School/Young Adult

    International

    Intra-organizational

    Law

    Mediation

    Medicine/Health

    Multidisciplinary

    Pedagogy

    Prisoner's Dilemma / Game Theory

    Psychology

    Public Disputes

    Technology

    Reviews

    Current Reviews: 0
    Write a Review
    PRIVACY POLICY Phone: 800-258-4406 (from within the U.S.) or 781-239-1111 (from outside the U.S.)
    E-mail: chouse@law.harvard.edu
    Copyright © 2004 The President and Fellows of Harvard College