HOME | POLICIES | FAQ | CONTACT  
Program on Negotiation Clearinghouse
Your cart is empty

Resources
Sign In
Returning users may sign in. Registering with the Clearinghouse offers several benefits, including:
  • Save your customer information for quicker shopping.
  • View your order history.
Collective Bargaining at Southern Express
ROLE SIMULATIONS
Collective Bargaining at Southern Express

Lawrence Susskind and Charles Hecksher
 
 
Per participant (Non-Profit/educational)$4.00
Per participant (For Profit)$5.00
Teacher's Package (Download Below)$0.00
Soft copyHard copyWhat to Order?

Download a review copy

Be the first to write a review

SCENARIO: The union and management bargaining teams for Speedy Express Airlines are preparing for upcoming negotiations. The last round of negotiations was disastrous; there was a strike and relationships were damaged. The leadership on both sides would like things to go better this time around and to work toward a more cooperative relationship. Trust between the two groups has eroded over the years, however, and any attempt by the leaders to employ a mutual gains approach likely will not be met with enthusiasm by their constituencies. The three issues on the table for this negotiation are wages, employment security, and medical benefits.

This role simulation has three rounds: an intra-team preparation round, an opening negotiation round, and a final negotiation round. Participants may be given different roles in the different rounds.

MAJOR LESSONS:

* There are often legitimate differences within bargaining teams. These internal conflicts should be worked out before inter-team bargaining begins, as unresolved internal conflict can create problems when it comes time to ratify agreements. This exercise allows participants to practice techniques and strategies for managing internal team conflict.

* In most collective bargaining situations, each side begins by staking out its positions -- usually before they hear what the other side's concerns are. This often leads to a concession-trading process, which is not conducive to value creation. Listening to the other side's interests before staking out opening positions can help achieve maximum joint gains.

* Each representative has a mandate that aids or constrains his/her ability to negotiate. How do representation issues affect the negotiation?

* How do threats or promises influence the behavior of other parties?

* How do the issues of relationship, precedent, and reputation affect the negotiation? Conversely, how does the negotiation process affect issues of relationship, precedent, and reputation?

TEACHER'S PACKAGE INCLUDES: Participant materials. No teaching note available for this case.

Time required2-3 hours
Number of participants6
Teams involvedYes
Agent presentNone
Neutral third party presentNone
ScoreableNo
Teaching notes availableNo
To search for other role simulations by attributes, use our role simulation advanced search tool.
Search

ADVANCED SEARCH >>
Topics
Arbitration

Business

Community

Consumer

Education

Environment

Ethics

Facilitation

Family

Government

High School/Young Adult

International

Intra-organizational

Law

Mediation

Medicine/Health

Multidisciplinary

Pedagogy

Prisoner's Dilemma / Game Theory

Psychology

Public Disputes

Technology

Reviews

Current Reviews: 0
Write a Review
PRIVACY POLICY Phone: 800-258-4406 (from within the U.S.) or 781-239-1111 (from outside the U.S.)
E-mail: chouse@law.harvard.edu
Copyright © 2004 The President and Fellows of Harvard College